Page 5

Below it is a reference number.

M-417.

I sit back.

Margaret reads silently, then exhales through her nose.

“Well.”

“Well,” I repeat.

Amelia looks between us.

“Does that change the provenance?”

“Not yet,” I tell her.

“It changes the question.”

I reach for the working chronology and draw a neat mark between Vienna and the Kensington acquisition.

“We know the painting was physically documented in Munich in 1901. Now we determine who controlled it while it was there. Dealer exhibition, private owner, temporary loan, consignment—something connects those points.”

Margaret folds her arms.

“The family ledger will need an amendment if you're right.”

“If the evidence supports it.”

“You've already found evidence.”

“I've found enough evidence to keep looking.”

I return to the folder. There's no triumph in the discovery. There shouldn't be. Provenance isn't about proving old records wrong for the pleasure of it. It's about replacing assumption with supportable fact.

I begin a fresh research note, recording the document number, archive location, date, exhibition reference, and the exact placement of the frame notation. At the bottom, I type my name and today's date before saving the record into the project's working database.

Blaire Wilson — Provenance Review

My name joins hundreds of others attached to the Kensington archive, another professional hand in a history much older than any of us.

The next document is a shipping invoice from Vienna, dated six months before the Munich exhibition. I’m comparing its dimensions with the current frame when the library doors open behind me.

I barely look up at first. People have been moving in and out all morning, carrying folders, collecting condition reports, and asking Margaret questions that could usually be answered by checking the project database. I finish entering the measurements before glancing toward the doorway.

The man standing there makes me forget the number I’ve just typed. He’s speaking quietly to Margaret, who has crossed the room to meet him, and I see him first in profile. He has to be at least six foot three, maybe a little more, with broad shoulders filling a dark navy suit that looks precise without making him look overly polished. There’s too much physical weight beneath it for that. The jacket fits close through his chest and waist, and when he slips one hand into his trouser pocket, the movement pulls the fabric across a body that clearly doesn’t come from occasionally wandering past a hotel gym.

My attention catches on his hands before I can stop it. They’re large and clean, with long fingers. One holds a thin document folder while the other rests loosely at his side.

Then he turns his head, and the resemblance hits me immediately. He looks like Sebastian, but not exactly. There’s the same strong bone structure there, along with the dark hair and unmistakable family face, but this man wears it differently. Sebastian has always carried himself with an ease that invites people closer. This man seems to make the space around him organize itself instead.

A faint streaks of silver cuts through the dark hair at his temples, but it’s his eyes that hold me when they meet mine. Pale blue. The interruption to my concentration becomes something far less professional.

His gaze moves over me once, not slowly enough to be rude and not quickly enough for me to miss it. His expression doesn’t change, but his attention settles with an intensity that makes me suddenly aware of the fitted cream dress I’m wearing, the curve of my waist against the table, and the fact that I’ve been leaning over a nineteenth-century painting for most of the morning with my hair pinned loosely at the back of my neck.

I straighten. He looks away first, turning back to Margaret.

“I was told my father left the Gresham memorandum here yesterday,” he says.